[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190115192716.GH5522@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:27:16 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression: spi: core: avoid waking pump thread from spi_sync
instead run teardown delayed
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:09:14PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 15/01/2019 15:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 02:26:02PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > Right, I think with the current code we just shouldn't be checking for
> > busy in teardown, since there's now a fairly big delay between idle and
> > actually turning the hardware off the name is just super misleading and
> > the logic confused. I don't have time to test right now but does
> > something like the below which changes it to a flag for the hardware
> > being powered up work:
> I tried your change but the same problem still persists.
OK, I feared as much with the stats not showing any activity. I do
think it needs a cleanup still but probably won't help here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists