[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190114173530.0d70d86f@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:35:30 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/core-api/mm: fix GFP combinations section name
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:32:58 +0200
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Fix the mismatch between "Useful GFP flag combinations" section naming in
> the DOC: section in include/linux/gfp.h and
> Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst b/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst
> index aa8e54b8..128e8a7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/mm-api.rst
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ users will want to use a plain ``GFP_KERNEL``.
> :doc: Reclaim modifiers
>
> .. kernel-doc:: include/linux/gfp.h
> - :doc: Common combinations
> + :doc: Useful GFP flag combinations
This also eliminates one warning:
./include/linux/gfp.h:1: warning: no structured comments found
I'll add that to the changelog. Applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists