lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:08:36 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <>
To:     Liviu Dudau <>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <>,
        Dave Airlie <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        DRI <>,
        Boris Brezillon <>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <>,
        "James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China)" <>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mali-dp tree

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:51:02AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 09:47:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Liviu,
> > 
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:12:19 +0000 Liviu Dudau <> wrote:
> > >
> > > That looks like the right fix, thank you for that!
> > 
> > Thanks for your verification.
> > 
> > > I will roll your patch into my tree.
> > 
> > You can only do that when your tree is merged with the drm tree (and
> > it should be part of the merge resolution).
> I can also rebase on top of the latest drm-next tree, that should not be
> a problem.

If you have a lot of patches already rebasing is kinda discouraged. There
might be other stuff that's conflicting and then making your entire tree
non-bisectable (maybe just on one platform that you missed in testing).

In that case just send out a pull for drm-next and include the merge
resolution in the pull request so Dave/I can double-check we did it right.
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists