[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190115120836.GN10517@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:08:36 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China)" <james.qian.wang@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mali-dp tree
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:51:02AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 09:47:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Liviu,
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:12:19 +0000 Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > That looks like the right fix, thank you for that!
> >
> > Thanks for your verification.
> >
> > > I will roll your patch into my tree.
> >
> > You can only do that when your tree is merged with the drm tree (and
> > it should be part of the merge resolution).
>
> I can also rebase on top of the latest drm-next tree, that should not be
> a problem.
If you have a lot of patches already rebasing is kinda discouraged. There
might be other stuff that's conflicting and then making your entire tree
non-bisectable (maybe just on one platform that you missed in testing).
In that case just send out a pull for drm-next and include the merge
resolution in the pull request so Dave/I can double-check we did it right.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists