[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190115135639.GH28946@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 05:56:39 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Patrick Stählin <me@...ki.ch>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@...-tech.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Clark <michaeljclark@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zong Li <zongbox@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] RISC-V: Assign hwcap only according to current
cpu.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:38:38AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> Currently, we set hwcap based on first valid cpu from
> DT. This may not be correct always as that CPU might not
> be current booting cpu.
>
> Set hwcap based on the current cpu instead of first
> valid CPU from DT.
This is generally the right thing to do. But can the kernel even cope
with different hwcaps per hart? I know arm land and I think x86 as well
don't, so we might want to add a sanity check that they match or reduce
them to the common subset.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists