linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] ASoC: soc-core: fix platform name vs. of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <312f8e32-36ed-cadb-77cb-54267680fefb@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:26:42 +0000
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, Matthias Reichl <hias@...us.com>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@...wiler.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] ASoC: soc-core: fix platform name vs.
 of_node assignement


On 14/01/2019 23:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:15:42AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 11/01/2019 08:51, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
>>> So, can you agree about these ?
>>> 1) Add enough information/documentation about legacy/modern style and its plan.
>>> 2) Add dirty pointer fixup patch as workaround
>>> 3) switch to modern style as much as possible
> 
>> I think that Mark needs to decided on whether use your 'dirty pointer'
>> fix or not.
> 
> I've gone ahead with Curtis' version of Morimoto-san's patch just now -
> hopefully that's fine for v5.0.  Like we've been saying neither approach
> is ideal, thanks Jon and Morimoto-san for your efforts analyzing this
> and your proposals.

Thanks! Works for me.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic