linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] irqchip: sifive-plic: Implement irq_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190115155727.GD13095@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:57:27 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] irqchip: sifive-plic: Implement
 irq_set_affinity() for SMP host

> +	if (!force)
> +		cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
> +	else
> +		cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);

Any reason for the inverted test?

Otherwise this looks fine to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>