[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190115154847.722648865@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:35:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 05/51] Btrfs: check inconsistence between chunk and block group
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
commit 6fb37b756acce6d6e045f79c3764206033f617b4 upstream.
With btrfs-corrupt-block, one can drop one chunk item and mounting
will end up with a panic in btrfs_full_stripe_len().
This doesn't not remove the BUG_ON, but instead checks it a bit
earlier when we find the block group item.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -9502,7 +9502,22 @@ static int find_first_block_group(struct
if (found_key.objectid >= key->objectid &&
found_key.type == BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY) {
- ret = 0;
+ struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
+ struct extent_map *em;
+
+ em_tree = &root->fs_info->mapping_tree.map_tree;
+ read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
+ em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, found_key.objectid,
+ found_key.offset);
+ read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
+ if (!em) {
+ btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
+ "logical %llu len %llu found bg but no related chunk",
+ found_key.objectid, found_key.offset);
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ } else {
+ ret = 0;
+ }
goto out;
}
path->slots[0]++;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists