linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] i2c:ocores: improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:37:07 +0100
From:   Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:     Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] i2c:ocores: improvements

Hi there,

I just want to ask if there has been any update about this patchset that I'm 
not aware off. Thanks

On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 12:38:22 PM CET Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > This patch set provides improvements to the i2c-ocore driver.
> > 
> > [V1 -> V2]
> > - replaced usleep_range() with udelay() so that the polling version can be
> > 
> >   used in atomic context.
> > 
> > - added dedicated patch for minor style issues
> > - fixed delay computation
> > - use spin_lock_irqsave(), instead of spin_trylock_irqsave(). IACK is
> > always> 
> >   necessary and a trylock would generate an extra interrupt for nothing
> > 
> > - make the driver ready for an eventual master_xfer_irqless()
> 
> Peter, do you have a time slot to review this?