linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 47/50] arm64: compat: Dont pull syscall number from regs in arm_compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190115154912.655131093@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:36:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 47/50] arm64: compat: Dont pull syscall number from regs in arm_compat_syscall

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

commit 53290432145a8eb143fe29e06e9c1465d43dc723 upstream.

The syscall number may have been changed by a tracer, so we should pass
the actual number in from the caller instead of pulling it from the
saved r7 value directly.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>


---
 arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c |    9 ++++-----
 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c    |    9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
@@ -66,12 +66,11 @@ do_compat_cache_op(unsigned long start,
 /*
  * Handle all unrecognised system calls.
  */
-long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
+long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno)
 {
 	siginfo_t info;
-	unsigned int no = regs->regs[7];
 
-	switch (no) {
+	switch (scno) {
 	/*
 	 * Flush a region from virtual address 'r0' to virtual address 'r1'
 	 * _exclusive_.  There is no alignment requirement on either address;
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *
 		 * way the calling program can gracefully determine whether
 		 * a feature is supported.
 		 */
-		if (no < __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END)
+		if (scno < __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END)
 			return -ENOSYS;
 		break;
 	}
@@ -119,6 +118,6 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *
 	info.si_addr  = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs) -
 			 (compat_thumb_mode(regs) ? 2 : 4);
 
-	arm64_notify_die("Oops - bad compat syscall(2)", regs, &info, no);
+	arm64_notify_die("Oops - bad compat syscall(2)", regs, &info, scno);
 	return 0;
 }
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
@@ -13,16 +13,15 @@
 #include <asm/thread_info.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 
-long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
+long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno);
 long sys_ni_syscall(void);
 
-asmlinkage long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 	long ret;
 	if (is_compat_task()) {
-		ret = compat_arm_syscall(regs);
+		ret = compat_arm_syscall(regs, scno);
 		if (ret != -ENOSYS)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ static void invoke_syscall(struct pt_reg
 		syscall_fn = syscall_table[array_index_nospec(scno, sc_nr)];
 		ret = __invoke_syscall(regs, syscall_fn);
 	} else {
-		ret = do_ni_syscall(regs);
+		ret = do_ni_syscall(regs, scno);
 	}
 
 	regs->regs[0] = ret;