linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:30:44 -0700
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper



On 2019-01-15 6:58 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> 
> Probably no need to keep this in a series with the RISC-V code, this can
> be queued up by the sh folks independently.

Oh, yeah, sorry, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to this when I
resent it. I sent the similar Arm changes to the appropriate list and,
yes, the sh ones should go to that maintainer.

@Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
the first one to the appropriate list.

Thanks,

Logan