[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190116063002.jq3aas6ofhaogmyk@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 07:30:02 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@...il.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniel.vetter@...el.com,
jgross@...e.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, noralf@...nnes.org,
hch@...radead.org,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xen-front: Make shmem backed display buffer
coherent
Hi,
> + if (!dma_map_sg(dev->dev, xen_obj->sgt->sgl, xen_obj->sgt->nents,
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto fail_free_sgt;
> + }
Hmm, so it seems the arm guys could not come up with a suggestion how to
solve that one in a better way. Ok, lets go with this then.
But didn't we agree that this deserves a comment exmplaining the purpose
of the dma_map_sg() call is to flush caches and that there is no actual
DMA happening here?
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists