[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22e0945b-9339-bb71-0eea-0a72cfc1e47f@epam.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:37:26 +0000
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@...m.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@...il.com>
CC: "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"daniel.vetter@...el.com" <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"noralf@...nnes.org" <noralf@...nnes.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xen-front: Make shmem backed display buffer
coherent
On 1/16/19 8:30 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> + if (!dma_map_sg(dev->dev, xen_obj->sgt->sgl, xen_obj->sgt->nents,
>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) {
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>> + goto fail_free_sgt;
>> + }
> Hmm, so it seems the arm guys could not come up with a suggestion how to
> solve that one in a better way. Ok, lets go with this then.
>
> But didn't we agree that this deserves a comment exmplaining the purpose
> of the dma_map_sg() call is to flush caches and that there is no actual
> DMA happening here?
My bad, will add the comment
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
Thank you,
Oleksandr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists