[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZwuLwEfTd+PnjvCs_WrAQyEUzT+_ToUecHS3ufJhNkeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:25:28 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
guillaume.tucker@...labora.com,
Matt Hart <matthew.hart@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
Paul Parsons <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: broonie-regulator/for-next boot bisection: v5.0-rc2-20-g61b67608c6b9
on meson8b-odroidc1
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:59 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> Linus, I'm going to revert this whole series - not sure what's gone
> wrong here but I guess we can test easily with kernelci which is good.
That's fine and I'm onto it, I am trying to create a mock system to test
the gpio-regulator so I have some confidence it's not breaking these
boards before submitting again.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists