linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: defer probing on dma channel request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:48:28 +0000
From:   Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:     "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: defer probing on dma channel request

Hello,

On 15.01.2019 23:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:03:32PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>> If the dma controller is not yet probed, defer i2c probe.
>> The error path in probe was slightly modified (no functional change)
>> to avoid triggering this WARN_ON():
>> "cg-pll0-div1 already disabled
>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:828 clk_core_disable+0xa8/0xb0"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
> 
> I just applied this series to i2c/for-next:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=85099&state=*
> 
> I haven't checked carefully but maybe it fixes/changes your issue? 

Not really as it doesn't seem to defer probing until the dma controller 
gets probed.

> If not, your patch most likely will need a rebase on top of the above.

Will rebase on latest i2c tree and re-send.

---
Best Regards, Laurentiu