[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <633db479-e1be-3b8b-45c4-06d1b651fe12@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:48:28 +0000
From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: defer probing on dma channel request
Hello,
On 15.01.2019 23:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:03:32PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>> If the dma controller is not yet probed, defer i2c probe.
>> The error path in probe was slightly modified (no functional change)
>> to avoid triggering this WARN_ON():
>> "cg-pll0-div1 already disabled
>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:828 clk_core_disable+0xa8/0xb0"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
>
> I just applied this series to i2c/for-next:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=85099&state=*
>
> I haven't checked carefully but maybe it fixes/changes your issue?
Not really as it doesn't seem to defer probing until the dma controller
gets probed.
> If not, your patch most likely will need a rebase on top of the above.
Will rebase on latest i2c tree and re-send.
---
Best Regards, Laurentiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists