[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874la9zcnr.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:09:12 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] arch: add split IPC system calls where needed
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:01 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:59 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
>> > > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
>> > > arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
>> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 12 ++++++++++++
>> >
>> > I have some changes I'd like to make to our syscall table that will
>> > clash with this.
>> >
>> > I'll try and send them today.
>>
>> Ok. Are those for 5.0 or 5.1? If they are intended for 5.0, it would be
>> nice for me to have a branch based on 5.0-rc1 that I can put
>> the other patches on top of.
>
> There is also another change that I considered:
>
> At the end of my series, we have a lot of entries like
>
> 245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32
> 245 64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime
> 245 spu clock_settime sys_clock_settime
>
> which could be folded into
>
> 245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32
> 245 spu64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime
>
> if we just add another option to the ABI field. Any thoughts on
> that?
My series splits spu out into a separate field. So the above would be:
245 32 - clock_settime sys_clock_settime32
245 64 spu clock_settime sys_clock_settime
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists