lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 12:59:46 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Intel graphics driver community testing & development 
        <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915: Move on the new pm runtime interface

On Monday, January 7, 2019 3:21:49 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:04 PM Vincent Guittot
> <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tvrtko,
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 13:32, Tvrtko Ursulin
> > <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21/12/2018 13:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 12:33, Tvrtko Ursulin
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > >>
> > > >> If it is always monotonic, then worst case we report one wrong sample,
> > > >> which I guess is still not ideal since someone could be querying the PMU
> > > >> with quite low frequency.
> > > >>
> > > >> There are tests which probably can hit this, but to run them
> > > >> automatically your patches would need to be rebased on drm-tip and maybe
> > > >> sent to our trybot. I can do that after the holiday break if you are
> > > >> okay with having the series waiting until then.
> > > >
> > > > yes looks good to me
> > >
> > > Looks good to me as well. And our CI agrees with it. So:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
> >
> > Thanks for the review and the test
> >
> > >
> > > I assume you will take the patch through some power related tree and we
> > > will eventually pull it back to drm-tip.
> >
> > Rafael,
> > How do you want to proceed with this patch and the 2 others of the serie ?
> 
> I'm going to queue up the whole series for 5.1.

And it has been queued up now, thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ