linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT] printk: Shortcut out of waiter spinning on PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190116072728.1fcc54d0@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 07:27:28 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] printk: Shortcut out of waiter spinning on
 PREEMPT_RT

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:43:40 +0900
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:

> On (01/16/19 11:07), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > The patch makes perfect sense. But it is not ready for upstream
> > because CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is not there yet. Do I get it
> > correctly, please?  
> 
> Yes. Hence Cc linux-rt-users.
> 
>

Actually it's the Subject line. We use "[PATCH RT]" to denote changes
caused by PREEMPT_RT existing.

-- Steve