[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc989920-a13b-d53b-db83-1584a7f53edc@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 12:50:42 +0000
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
Subject: preempt_schedule_irq() loop question
Hi,
I've been wandering around preempt_schedule_irq() in sched/core.c, and
got curious regarding how the arch code calls it.
The main part of preempt_schedule_irq() is:
do {
preempt_disable();
local_irq_enable();
__schedule(true);
local_irq_disable();
sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
} while (need_resched());
Yet all the arch entry.S I looked at (I stopped after arm64, arm, x86_32,
MIPS, powerpc) wrap the call to preempt_schedule_irq() in another
do { ... } while (need_resched())
For instance, this is what's done in arm64:
1: bl preempt_schedule_irq // irq en/disable is done inside
ldr x0, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // get new tasks TI_FLAGS
tbnz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED, 1b // needs rescheduling?
I naively thought this could be attributed to something like
preempt_schedule_irq() historically not having an inner loop, but it seems
to have been there since the beginning of time (or at least up to the point
where the git history stops).
I don't see why we need to have these nested loops - AFAICT the one in
preempt_schedule_irq() would suffice. What am I missing?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists