linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] akcipher: Introduce verify2 for public key algorithms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21754.1547655551@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:19:11 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] akcipher: Introduce verify2 for public key algorithms

Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org> wrote:

> Current akcipher .verify() just decrypts signature to uncover message
> hash, which is then verified in upper level public_key_verify_signature
> by memcmp with the expected signature value, which is never passed into
> verify().

I think it would be better to make ->verify() take the data hash we've been
given rather than returning the expected hash for the caller to compare.  That
way the callers don't have to do two different things, depending on how the
crypto algo works.

David