linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] etnaviv: allow to build on ARC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:21:25 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
Cc:     etnaviv@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux+etnaviv@...linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>,
        linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>,
        Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] etnaviv: allow to build on ARC

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:31:57PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> ARC HSDK SoC has Vivante GPU IP so allow build etnaviv for ARC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/Kconfig
> index 342591a1084e..49a9957c3373 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  config DRM_ETNAVIV
>  	tristate "ETNAVIV (DRM support for Vivante GPU IP cores)"
>  	depends on DRM
> -	depends on ARCH_MXC || ARCH_DOVE || ARM || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on ARCH_MXC || ARCH_DOVE || ARM || ARC || COMPILE_TEST

Is there any reason to not just remove the dependencies entirely?
It seems like it could literally build everywhere, and who knows what
other SOCs the IP blocks end up in sooner or later?