[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190116193542.32558-1-malat@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:35:41 +0100
From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] bpf: Correctly annotate implicit fall through in bpf_base_func_proto
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
this place in the code produced a warnings (W=1).
To preserve as much of the existing comment only change a ‘:’ into a ‘,’.
This is enough change, to match the regular expression expected by GCC.
This commit remove the following warning:
net/core/filter.c:5310:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
---
v2: reword the patch subject, remove a typo
net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 2b3b436ef545..d9076e609fca 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5309,7 +5309,7 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk:
if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return bpf_get_trace_printk_proto();
- /* else: fall through */
+ /* else, fall through */
default:
return NULL;
}
--
2.19.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists