linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: (ina3221) Implement ti,single-shot DT property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190117225842.GA23511@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:58:42 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:     jdelvare@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: (ina3221) Implement ti,single-shot DT
 property

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 02:30:13PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:35:55AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > > +	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "ti,single-shot"))
> > > +		ina->single_shot = true;
> > > +
> > 	ina->single_shot = of_property_read_bool(np, "ti,single-shot");
> > 
> > No need to resend right now; let's wait for feedback from Rob.
> 
> Looks like Rob has acked. Is this resend version fine for review?
> 
"Right now" was supposed to mean that you should wait for Rob's
feedback before sending v3 with the feedback above applied.
Did you send that version ? I don't see it in patchwork, nor
in my inbox.

Thanks,
Guenter