[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117231622.GA9310@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:16:22 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: BrĂ¼ns, Stefan <Stefan.Bruens@...h-aachen.de>,
"jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] hwmon: (ina2xx) Improve current and power reading
precision
Hi Guenter,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:13:23PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I have one claim stating that your change won't make a difference,
> and your claim that it would. That leaves me with no choice but to
> spend a large amount of time with the datasheet, and possibly with
> my evaluation boards, trying to find out who is correct. Unfortunately,
> time is scarce to come by those days. I would very much prefer for
> you folks to sort out your differences and present me with a single
> opinion.
>
> Long term the best solution would really be to replace the hwmon
> driver with the iio driver and use the iio-hwmon bridge. The ina2xx
> driver doesn't support limits, so there is no real benefit of using
> the hwmon driver over the iio driver, at least assuming that the
> iio driver supports all the attributes. So maybe you should make your
> case for the changes in the iio driver.
Thanks for the input. Let's drop this hwmon change then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists