linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16] block: sed-opal: support shadow MBR done flag and write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1901171030320.26315@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:40:49 +0100 (CET)
From:   David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] block: sed-opal: support shadow MBR done flag and
 write

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> the way the series appear looks odd, because it wasn't threaded or
> even ordered, and the patches from Jonas seem to have been sent out
> by you under his name.  Can you resend them carefully threaded, all
> mails from you with the additional from header for resends?

Ouch. I'm sorry about the ordering/threading. I (wrongly) assumed that if 
I just send the mails in order, that suffices. I'll try to fix that in v2.

W.r.t. "from": Most of the patches were originally created by Jonas. I 
touched some in order to apply review suggestions or make some small 
fixes. But some stayed identical to Jonas' version and I didn't want to 
strip him of authorship. I used git format-patch to produce the mails and 
the commit author was propagated to the from header.

What is the proper way when I am not the author?

Best regards,
David