lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117100915.GA5023@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:09:15 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "S, Shirish" <Shirish.S@....com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "maintainer : X86 ARCHITECTURE" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "open list : X86 ARCHITECTURE" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce/amd: carve out MC4_MISC thresholding quirk

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:06:06AM +0000, S wrote:
> Thanks for the support, i shall follow the practice from next patch onwards.

Ok, but this mail is still broken. I see:

From: S
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "S, Shirish" <Shirish.S@....com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,

So I leave it up to you to pay attention to it and to fix it - I think
I've pointed it to you enough times already.

In case you're wondering why you're not getting replies to your mails,
you'll know why.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ