[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91108b9b-fe05-1068-b07e-872cb4cd4012@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:08:52 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: qcom: Add suspend/resume support
Hi Brian,
On 1/17/2019 3:01 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
>
> You can use the __maybe_unused attribute to remove the #ifdef:
>
> static int __maybe_unused qcom_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
Thanks for looking into this.
As for __maybe_unused, I think it's better to keep #ifdef rather than
this attribute which seems to be meaning unused when actually its
possible that it's used often(PM_SLEEP is def y). It's like saying
unused when you are actually using it. The attribute seems like a
hack to avoid compilation error. Please correct me if I am wrong.
- Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists