[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MeA_AMvEikj9s03ikiFJwOi+4eri7Ba8ZxTwMogEJvdrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:32:42 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] ARM: dts: da850: fix interrupt numbers for clocksource
czw., 17 sty 2019 o 15:23 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> napisaĆ(a):
>
> On 11/01/19 10:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > The timer interrupts specified in commit 3652e2741f42 ("ARM: dts:
> > da850: Add clocks") are wrong but since the current timer code
> > hard-codes them, the bug was never spotted.
> >
> > This patch must go into stable since, once we introduce a proper
> > clocksource driver, devices with buggy device tree will stop booting.
>
> Is this the case where someone uses device-tree from a stable tree and
> kernel from latest mainline?
>
Well, if someone wants to use an old device tree and a newer kernel,
then it'll be broken anyway. If we get it to stable then at least the
fixed device tree will work in the future. That was my reasoning.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists