[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO-hwJKyBHM1Yy8=pQrbDoArTOX4=8G6f0jECv4x1mth+LZZDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:42:44 +0100
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
廖崇榮 <kt.liao@....com.tw>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: elantech: Use SMBus based on bus info
Hi Kai-Heng,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:30 AM Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> There are some new HP laptops with Elantech touchpad don't support
> multitouch.
>
> Both ETP_BUS_SMB_HST_NTFY_ONLY and ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_HST_NTFY devices can
> use SMBus to support 5 fingers touch, so we need to chech them too.
>
> So use elantech_use_host_notify() to do a more thouroughly check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> index 9fe075c137dc..5bcf1c147eb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> @@ -1799,6 +1799,34 @@ static int elantech_create_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> leave_breadcrumbs);
> }
>
> +static bool elantech_use_host_notify(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> + struct elantech_device_info *info)
> +{
> + if (ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version))
> + return true;
> +
> + switch (info->bus) {
> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_ONLY:
> + /* expected case */
> + break;
> + case ETP_BUS_SMB_ALERT_ONLY:
> + /* fall-through */
> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_ALERT:
> + psmouse_dbg(psmouse, "Ignoring SMBus provider through alert protocol.\n");
> + break;
> + case ETP_BUS_SMB_HST_NTFY_ONLY:
> + /* fall-through */
> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_HST_NTFY:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + psmouse_dbg(psmouse,
> + "Ignoring SMBus bus provider %d.\n",
> + info->bus);
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * elantech_setup_smbus - called once the PS/2 devices are enumerated
> * and decides to instantiate a SMBus InterTouch device.
> @@ -1818,7 +1846,7 @@ static int elantech_setup_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> * i2c_blacklist_pnp_ids.
> * Old ICs are up to the user to decide.
> */
> - if (!ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version) ||
> + if (!elantech_use_host_notify(psmouse, info) ||
That was my initial approach of the series, but I ended up being more
conservative as this would flip all of the existing elantech SMBUS
capable touchpads to use elan_i2c.
And I didn't want to deal with 4/5 year old laptops that suddenly broke.
So I wonder if you can restrict this default change to the recent
laptops (let's say 2018+). Maybe by looking at their FW version or
something else in the DMI?
Cheers,
Benjamin
> psmouse_matches_pnp_id(psmouse, i2c_blacklist_pnp_ids))
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> @@ -1838,34 +1866,6 @@ static int elantech_setup_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static bool elantech_use_host_notify(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> - struct elantech_device_info *info)
> -{
> - if (ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version))
> - return true;
> -
> - switch (info->bus) {
> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_ONLY:
> - /* expected case */
> - break;
> - case ETP_BUS_SMB_ALERT_ONLY:
> - /* fall-through */
> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_ALERT:
> - psmouse_dbg(psmouse, "Ignoring SMBus provider through alert protocol.\n");
> - break;
> - case ETP_BUS_SMB_HST_NTFY_ONLY:
> - /* fall-through */
> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_HST_NTFY:
> - return true;
> - default:
> - psmouse_dbg(psmouse,
> - "Ignoring SMBus bus provider %d.\n",
> - info->bus);
> - }
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> int elantech_init_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> {
> struct elantech_device_info info;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists