linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Add power domain driver for corners on msm8996/sdm845

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <90f8bfec-f1dd-6031-9d98-468b29627a2f@free.fr>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:03:10 +0100
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Add power domain driver for corners on
 msm8996/sdm845

On 10/01/2019 05:02, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> Rajendra Nayak (9):
>   dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings
>   OPP: Add support for parsing the 'opp-level' property
>   dt-bindings: power: Add qcom rpm power domain driver bindings
>   soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a Power domain driver to model corners
>   soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state
>   arm64: dts: msm8996: Add rpmpd device node
>   soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver
>   arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node
>   soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Mark mx as a parent for cx
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt |   3 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt  | 145 +++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi         |  34 ++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi          |  51 +++

Whenever I see these patches adding support for msm8996 (aka sdm820) and sdm845
simultaneously, I think to myself: "Why is sdm835 being left out? It was released
between sdm820 and sdm845, it cannot be /that/ different."

So I'm wondering: how much extra work would it be to add support for msm8998
aka sdm835?

Regards.