[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117155417.GA9629@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:54:17 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yong.zhi@...el.com" <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
"daniel.vetter@...ll.ch" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"syeh@...are.com" <syeh@...are.com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"bingbu.cao@...el.com" <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
"imre.deak@...el.com" <imre.deak@...el.com>,
"tian.shu.qiu@...el.com" <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
"jian.xu.zheng@...el.com" <jian.xu.zheng@...el.com>,
"shiraz.saleem@...el.com" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
"sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com" <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/scatterlist: Provide a DMA page iterator
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:30:01AM +0100, hch@....de wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:24:36AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > The fact is there is 0 industry interest in using RDMA on platforms
> > that can't do HW DMA cache coherency - the kernel syscalls required to
> > do the cache flushing on the IO path would just destroy performance to
> > the point of making RDMA pointless. Better to use netdev on those
> > platforms.
>
> In general there is no syscall required for doing cache flushing, you
> just issue the proper instructions directly from userspace.
At least on the ARM/MIPS systems I've worked with like this the cache
manipulation instructions are privileged and cannot be executed by
userspace. So the general case requires a syscall.
> In that case we just need to block userspace DMA access entirely.
> Which given the amount of problems it creates sounds like a pretty
> good idea anyway.
I doubt there is any support for that idea...
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists