lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:00:39 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
        kirill@...temov.name, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/25] mm, compaction: Avoid rescanning the same
 pageblock multiple times

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:16:54PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/4/19 1:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Pageblocks are marked for skip when no pages are isolated after a scan.
> > However, it's possible to hit corner cases where the migration scanner
> > gets stuck near the boundary between the source and target scanner. Due
> > to pages being migrated in blocks of COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX, pages that
> > are migrated can be reallocated before the pageblock is complete. The
> > pageblock is not necessarily skipped so it can be rescanned multiple
> > times. Similarly, a pageblock with some dirty/writeback pages may fail
> > to isolate and be rescanned until writeback completes which is wasteful.
> 
>      ^ migrate? If we failed to isolate, then it wouldn't bump nr_isolated.
> Wonder if we could do better checks and not isolate pages that cannot be at the
> moment migrated anyway.
> 

Potentially but it would be considered a layering violation. There may be
per-fs reasons why a page cannot migrate and no matter how well we check,
there will be race conditions.

> > The fault latency reduction is large and while the THP allocation
> > success rate is only slightly higher, it's already high at this
> > point of the series.
> > 
> > Compaction migrate scanned    60718343.00    31772603.00
> > Compaction free scanned      933061894.00    63267928.00
> 
> Hm I thought the order of magnitude difference between migrate and free scanned
> was already gone at this point as reported in the previous 2 patches.

There are corner cases that mean there can be large differences for a
single run. In some cases it doesn't matter but this one might have been
unlucky. It's something that occurs less as the series progresses.

> Or is this
> from different system/configuration?

I don't *think* so. While I had multiple machines running tests, I'm
pretty sure I wrote the changelogs based on one machine and only checked
the others had nothing strange.

> Anyway, encouraging result. I would expect
> that after "Keep migration source private to a single compaction instance" sets
> the skip bits much more early and aggressively, the rescans would not happen
> anymore thanks to those, even if cached pfns were not updated.
> 

Yes and no. The corner case where the scanner gets stuck rescanning one
pageblock can happen when the fast search fails. In that case, the
linear scanner needs to get to the end of a pageblock and if it fails,
it'll simply rescan like a lunatic. This happened specifically for pages
under writeback for me.

> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> 

Thanks

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists