linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/7] devicetree: bindings: Document domains controller bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190117162244.GC7003@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:22:44 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Cc:     "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>,
        "benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] devicetree: bindings: Document domains controller
 bindings

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:20:45PM +0000, Benjamin GAIGNARD wrote:
> On 1/16/19 6:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I suspect this is going to need a few more words about what a Domains
> > Controller is.

> Does the description of the framework in the cover letter looks better 
> for you ?

Yes, that looks reasonable to me.

> I'm not comfortable to put it in bindings file but maybe I'm wrong.

I can't see how someone will understand the binding document as a
standalone document - it's not like domains controllers are a widely
understood concept in the industry.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)