linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] scsi: ufs: qcom: Expose the reset controller for PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:28:07 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:     Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] scsi: ufs: qcom: Expose the reset controller for PHY


Kishon,

> On 12/01/19 4:31 AM, Evan Green wrote:
>> Expose a reset controller that the phy can use to perform its
>> initialization in a single callback.
>> 
>> Also, change the use of the phy functions from ufs-qcom such that
>> phy_poweron actually fires up the phy, and phy_poweroff actually
>> powers it down.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
>
> Can I get Ack for this patch from SCSI MAINTAINERS?

No objection from me if there is general consensus that moving reset to
the phy is the right thing to do.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering