[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1imyoqaq0.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:28:07 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] scsi: ufs: qcom: Expose the reset controller for PHY
Kishon,
> On 12/01/19 4:31 AM, Evan Green wrote:
>> Expose a reset controller that the phy can use to perform its
>> initialization in a single callback.
>>
>> Also, change the use of the phy functions from ufs-qcom such that
>> phy_poweron actually fires up the phy, and phy_poweroff actually
>> powers it down.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
>
> Can I get Ack for this patch from SCSI MAINTAINERS?
No objection from me if there is general consensus that moving reset to
the phy is the right thing to do.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists