[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSMsP=YqbQZ2YWJ_DJZajzuQQ_jAVP3j7RV+9beD5qnGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:32:24 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak59 V3 2/4] audit: add syscall information to
CONFIG_CHANGE records
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:26 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 2019-01-17 12:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:08 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:21:40 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:33 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:58:58 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:18 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Tie syscall information to all CONFIG_CHANGE calls since they
> > > > > > > are all a result of user actions.
>
> > I see you added LKML to the To/CC line. Fun. Unless they've been
> > following the audit list for the past several years I'm not sure they
> > have all the context to fully understand some of the things in this
> > thread, but sure, why not.
>
> I added LKML in the original patchset posting, not Steve.
That you did, my apologies. Why did my mail client highlight that as
new? Oh well, my comments stand regardless; I'm just sorry about the
LKML noise I added to the top.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists