[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190117201342.GA3687@osiris>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:13:42 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ipc: introduce ksys_ipc()/compat_ksys_ipc() for s390
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 05:29:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:29 PM Heiko Carstens
> > SYSCALL_DEFINE1(s390_personality, unsigned int, personality)
> > {
> > diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> > index ab9d0e3c6d50..ad016a7db0ea 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> > @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(kexec_file_load);
> > /* s390 */
> > COND_SYSCALL(s390_pci_mmio_read);
> > COND_SYSCALL(s390_pci_mmio_write);
> > -COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(s390_ipc);
> > +COND_SYSCALL(s390_ipc);
> >
> > /* powerpc */
> > COND_SYSCALL(rtas);
>
> I think you need to keep the
>
> COND_SYSCALL_COMPAT(s390_ipc);
>
> here, otherwise it still fails with CONFIG_SYSV_IPC=n, CONFIG_COMPAT=y, right?
Yes, you're right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists