linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] gcov: clang: pick GCC vs Clang format depending on compiler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmji0RC6Whrr5y2mcsEQhw_VA619607xAhK+XTZ5JSWVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:48:44 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Tri Vo <trong@...roid.com>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...roid.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] gcov: clang: pick GCC vs Clang format depending on compiler

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:19 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> > I think this was the suggestion from Masahiro from v1?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> What is strange is, 2/4 added GCOV_FORMAT_CLANG,
> then 4/4 deletes it.
>
>
> Probably, changing the patch order,
> or squashing 4/4 into 2/4 would be cleaner.

Sure; Tri, I think it's ok for you to become author of 2/4 and put a
"Co-authored-by:" tag for Greg.

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers