lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL3LdT5DV1faoFsX6CH4LRSQa9rn-Eg71sRu64=bs3w7WCGg4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:55:07 -0800
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] igb: reconnecting of cable not always detected

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:36 AM Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> writes:
> > Thanks for the data. It is actually useful. There are a few things
> > that I see that seem to point to an obvious issue.
>
> Any news on this?
>
> A collegue of mine states (I have not checked this) that a kernel
> 4.9.0-6-686 from a Debian Live ISO (debian-live-9.4.0-i386-kde.iso)
> didn't show this behavior, so we have some kind of regression perhaps?

Our validation team was only able to reproduce this once, but is not
able to reproduce the issue again or even consistently to be able to
adequate debug the issue.

Are you still seeing the issue with the latest upstream kernel from
either David Miller's net-next tree or Linus's tree?

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ