[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CsTiQV78d6ZvUBwzzU9iF8ZnCpp_O7VBrvxstZ6kNNRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:26:07 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@...il.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/9] crypto: morus - Cleanup license mess
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 9:17 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> --- a/include/crypto/morus1280_glue.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/morus1280_glue.h
> @@ -1,15 +1,10 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
Shouldn't this be: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ ?
At least this is the form documented in Documentation/process/license-rules.rst:
" License identifiers for licenses like [L]GPL with the 'or later' option
are constructed by using a "+" for indicating the 'or later' option.::
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists