[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190118105807.26425-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:58:06 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: keescook@...omium.org
Cc: re.emese@...il.com, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandarajah@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gcc-plugins: arm_ssp_per_task_plugin: sign extend the SP mask
The ARM per-task stack protector GCC plugin hits an assert in
the compiler in some case, due to the fact the the SP mask
expression is not sign-extended as it should be. So fix that.
Suggested-by: Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandarajah@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
---
scripts/gcc-plugins/arm_ssp_per_task_plugin.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/arm_ssp_per_task_plugin.c b/scripts/gcc-plugins/arm_ssp_per_task_plugin.c
index de70b8470971..a65fbefb8501 100644
--- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/arm_ssp_per_task_plugin.c
+++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/arm_ssp_per_task_plugin.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static unsigned int arm_pertask_ssp_rtl_execute(void)
for (insn = get_insns(); insn; insn = NEXT_INSN(insn)) {
const char *sym;
rtx body;
- rtx masked_sp;
+ rtx mask, masked_sp;
/*
* Find a SET insn involving a SYMBOL_REF to __stack_chk_guard
@@ -33,12 +33,13 @@ static unsigned int arm_pertask_ssp_rtl_execute(void)
* produces the address of the copy of the stack canary value
* stored in struct thread_info
*/
+ mask = GEN_INT(sext_hwi(sp_mask, GET_MODE_PRECISION(Pmode)));
masked_sp = gen_reg_rtx(Pmode);
emit_insn_before(gen_rtx_SET(masked_sp,
gen_rtx_AND(Pmode,
stack_pointer_rtx,
- GEN_INT(sp_mask))),
+ mask)),
insn);
SET_SRC(body) = gen_rtx_PLUS(Pmode, masked_sp,
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists