linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] acpi: store acpi_rsdp address for later kexec usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACPcB9dTm_2UCRord01oW+mmoPYY7dFTHj7qFrMxOnhPx3Ov3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:43:20 +0800
From:   Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        "Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] acpi: store acpi_rsdp address for later kexec usage

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 7:26 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

> No, this is getting completely nuts: there's a bunch of functions which
> all end up returning boot_params's field except pvh_get_root_pointer().
>
> And now you're adding a late variant. And the cmdline paramater
> acpi_rsdp is in a CONFIG_KEXEC wrapper, and and...
>
> Wait until Chao Fan's stuff is applied, then do your changes ontop
> an drop all that ifdeffery. We will make this RDSP thing enabled
> unconditionally so that there's no need for ifdeffery and function
> wrappers.
>
> Also, after Chao's stuff, you won't need to call
> acpi_os_get_root_pointer() because the early code would've done that.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Good suggestion, will wait for Chao's update then.


--
Best Regards,
Kairui Song