[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1547814450-18902-5-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:27:29 +0200
From: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] sched/task_struct: convert task_struct.usage to refcount_t
atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference
counters with the following properties:
- counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set()
- a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero
- once counter reaches zero, its further
increments aren't allowed
- counter schema uses basic atomic operations
(set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.)
Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided
refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows
and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows
can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable.
The variable task_struct.usage is used as pure reference counter.
Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations.
**Important note for maintainers:
Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c
have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic
counterparts.
The full comparison can be seen in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/57 and it is hopefully soon
in state to be merged to the documentation tree.
Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides
enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in
some rare cases it might matter.
Please double check that you don't have some undocumented
memory guarantees for this variable usage.
For the task_struct.usage it might make a difference
in following places:
- put_task_struct(): decrement in refcount_dec_and_test() only
provides RELEASE ordering and control dependency on success
vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 3 ++-
include/linux/sched/task.h | 4 ++--
init/init_task.c | 2 +-
kernel/fork.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5e66900..bead0c7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
#include <linux/resource.h>
#include <linux/latencytop.h>
#include <linux/sched/prio.h>
@@ -608,7 +609,7 @@ struct task_struct {
randomized_struct_fields_start
void *stack;
- atomic_t usage;
+ refcount_t usage;
/* Per task flags (PF_*), defined further below: */
unsigned int flags;
unsigned int ptrace;
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h
index 44c6f15..2e97a22 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ extern void sched_exec(void);
#define sched_exec() {}
#endif
-#define get_task_struct(tsk) do { atomic_inc(&(tsk)->usage); } while(0)
+#define get_task_struct(tsk) do { refcount_inc(&(tsk)->usage); } while(0)
extern void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t);
static inline void put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&t->usage))
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&t->usage))
__put_task_struct(t);
}
diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
index 756be60..0ad9772 100644
--- a/init/init_task.c
+++ b/init/init_task.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task
#endif
.state = 0,
.stack = init_stack,
- .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
+ .usage = REFCOUNT_INIT(2),
.flags = PF_KTHREAD,
.prio = MAX_PRIO - 20,
.static_prio = MAX_PRIO - 20,
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 504324c..a4ac220 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static inline void put_signal_struct(struct signal_struct *sig)
void __put_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
WARN_ON(!tsk->exit_state);
- WARN_ON(atomic_read(&tsk->usage));
+ WARN_ON(refcount_read(&tsk->usage));
WARN_ON(tsk == current);
cgroup_free(tsk);
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
* One for us, one for whoever does the "release_task()" (usually
* parent)
*/
- atomic_set(&tsk->usage, 2);
+ refcount_set(&tsk->usage, 2);
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE
tsk->btrace_seq = 0;
#endif
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists