lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1547820914.1909.1@crapouillou.net>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:15:14 -0300
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] MIPS: DTS: CI20: Set BCH clock to 200 MHz

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:07 AM, Boris Brezillon 
<bbrezillon@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 22:06:27 -0300
> Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net <mailto:paul@...pouillou.net>> 
> wrote:
> 
>>  This is currently done inside the jz4780-bch driver, but it really
>>  should be done here instead.
>> 
> 
> I disagree with that statement. If it's a per-SoC constraint then you
> can select the appropriate rate based on the compatible in the driver.
> If the clock rate depends on the NAND chip it probably means it's used
> to generate the RE/WE pulse and should depend on the NAND timings
> passed to ->setup_data_interface(). In either case, this should not be
> specified in the DT.

Alright, I'll drop the patch.

> Regards,
> 
> Boris
> 
>>  Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net 
>> <mailto:paul@...pouillou.net>>
>>  ---
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> 
>>  diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts 
>> b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>>  index 50cff3cbcc6d..aa892ec54d0a 100644
>>  --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>>  +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dts
>>  @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@
>>   		pinctrl-names = "default";
>>   		pinctrl-0 = <&pins_nemc>;
>> 
>>  +		assigned-clocks = <&cgu JZ4780_CLK_BCH>;
>>  +		assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>;
>>  +
>>   		nand@1 {
>>   			reg = <1>;
>> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ