linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190118153251.GT5544@atomide.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:32:51 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation

* Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com> [190118 10:54]:
> Tony,
> 
> On 16/01/19 9:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> [190116 13:28]:
> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 05:28:36PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >>> The SDHCI core is know properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO,
> >>
> >> "know" -> "now"
> >>
> >>> so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement
> >>> ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro().
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Note: this patch has only been compiled tested, as I don't have the
> >>> hardware to test it.
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 1 -
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> I can't runtime test this myself, but it certainly looks like this would
> >> do the right thing because it calls the core now call the very same
> >> function as this used to, so:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >>
> >> Adding Tony and linux-omap for a slightly wider audience and hopefully
> >> find someone to test this on. For reference, the whole series is here:
> >>
> >> 	https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mmc/list/?series=66905
> > 
> > Thanks Kishon can you please review and test?
> > 
> 
> I can help with testing once Thomas posts a v2.

OK great thanks!

Tony