[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612BA4B8723A@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 17:24:19 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] sched: convert sighand_struct.count to refcount_t
> Hi Elena,
Hi!
>
> [...]
>
> > **Important note for maintainers:
> >
> > Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c
> > have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic
> > counterparts.
> > The full comparison can be seen in
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/57 and it is hopefully soon
> > in state to be merged to the documentation tree.
>
> Just a remark to point out that that document got merged, even though
> in a different location/format: c.f.,
>
> b6e859f6cdd1 ("docs: refcount_t documentation")
>
Ups, indeed, forgot that we merged the docs. It has been long time that
these patches has been sitting in my old repo.
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists