[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190119161523.87999-1-luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:15:23 +0100
From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: fix __percpu declaration of worker_data
This variable is declared as:
static struct powerclamp_worker_data * __percpu worker_data;
In other words, a percpu pointer to struct ...
But this variable not used like so but as a pointer to a percpu
struct powerclamp_worker_data.
So fix the declaration as:
static struct powerclamp_worker_data __percpu *worker_data;
This also quiets Sparse's warnings from __verify_pcpu_ptr(), like:
494:49: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
494:49: expected void const [noderef] <asn:3> *__vpp_verify
494:49: got struct powerclamp_worker_data *
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
index 7571f7c2e..c7cba20bd 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct powerclamp_worker_data {
bool clamping;
};
-static struct powerclamp_worker_data * __percpu worker_data;
+static struct powerclamp_worker_data __percpu * worker_data;
static struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev;
static unsigned long *cpu_clamping_mask; /* bit map for tracking per cpu
* clamping kthread worker
--
2.20.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists