linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Update .clang-format with the latest for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Jan 2019 20:32:36 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Update .clang-format with the latest
 for_each macro list

Hi Joe,

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 8:06 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> This misses all the directory/file specific #defines
> outside of include/ with for_each

Indeed, the command only searches the include/ directory, but when
searching for the entire tree, it returns ~500 more entries (vs. the
~300 original ones). I cannot recall if there was a reason to search
only inside include/, though.

> $ git grep "#define.*for_each" | grep -v '^include' | wc -l
> 619
>
> Is it possible to make this generic somehow instead?
> Perhaps extend .clang_format with regexes?
>
> (?:[a-z0-9_]+_)?for_each(?:_[a-z_]+)
> [a-z0-9_]+_for_each

What do you mean?

Cheers,
Miguel