| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190119005022.61321-1-shakeelb@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:50:22 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mm, oom: fix use-after-free in oom_kill_process
In our internal syzbot instance running on upstream kernel, we see the
following crash.
--------------------
syzbot has found the following crash on:
HEAD commit: 47bfa6d9dc8c Merge tag 'selinux-pr-20190115' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/g..
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
...
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
See http://go/syzbot for details on how to handle this bug.
kmem: usage 0kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0
Memory cgroup stats for /syz1: cache:28KB rss:274692KB rss_huge:190464KB shmem:64KB mapped_file:0KB dirty:0KB writeback:0KB swap:0KB inactive_anon:222780KB active_anon:4152KB inactive_file:0KB active_file:0KB unevictable:47872KB
oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=syz1,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/syz1,task_memcg=/syz1,task=syz-executor1,pid=15858,uid=0
Memory cgroup out of memory: Kill process 15858 (syz-executor1) score 1148 or sacrifice child
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in oom_kill_process.cold+0x484/0x9d4 mm/oom_kill.c:978
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880595f6c40 by task syz-executor1/15817
CPU: 1 PID: 15817 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2+ #29
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x1db/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_address_description.cold+0x7c/0x20d mm/kasan/report.c:187
kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:317
__asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/generic_report.c:135
oom_kill_process.cold+0x484/0x9d4 mm/oom_kill.c:978
out_of_memory+0x885/0x1420 mm/oom_kill.c:1133
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x160/0x210 mm/memcontrol.c:1393
mem_cgroup_oom mm/memcontrol.c:1721 [inline]
try_charge+0xd44/0x19b0 mm/memcontrol.c:2283
memcg_kmem_charge_memcg+0x7c/0x130 mm/memcontrol.c:2591
memcg_kmem_charge+0x13b/0x340 mm/memcontrol.c:2624
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7b8/0xdc0 mm/page_alloc.c:4559
__alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:473 [inline]
__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:486 [inline]
alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:500 [inline]
alloc_thread_stack_node kernel/fork.c:246 [inline]
dup_task_struct kernel/fork.c:849 [inline]
copy_process+0x847/0x8710 kernel/fork.c:1753
_do_fork+0x1a9/0x1170 kernel/fork.c:2227
__do_sys_clone kernel/fork.c:2334 [inline]
__se_sys_clone kernel/fork.c:2328 [inline]
__x64_sys_clone+0xbf/0x150 kernel/fork.c:2328
do_syscall_64+0x1a3/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x457ec9
Code: 6d b7 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 3b b7 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f36f091cc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000038
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 0000000000457ec9
RDX: 9999999999999999 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 000000000073bf00 R08: ffffffffffffffff R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f36f091d6d4
R13: 00000000004be2a0 R14: 00000000004ce760 R15: 00000000ffffffff
Allocated by task 15809:
save_stack+0x45/0xd0 mm/kasan/common.c:73
set_track mm/kasan/common.c:85 [inline]
__kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:496 [inline]
__kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xcf/0xe0 mm/kasan/common.c:469
kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:504 [inline]
kasan_slab_alloc+0xf/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:411
kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x144/0x710 mm/slab.c:3633
alloc_task_struct_node kernel/fork.c:158 [inline]
dup_task_struct kernel/fork.c:845 [inline]
copy_process+0x405b/0x8710 kernel/fork.c:1753
_do_fork+0x1a9/0x1170 kernel/fork.c:2227
__do_sys_clone kernel/fork.c:2334 [inline]
__se_sys_clone kernel/fork.c:2328 [inline]
__x64_sys_clone+0xbf/0x150 kernel/fork.c:2328
do_syscall_64+0x1a3/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Freed by task 15817:
save_stack+0x45/0xd0 mm/kasan/common.c:73
set_track mm/kasan/common.c:85 [inline]
__kasan_slab_free+0x102/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:458
kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 mm/kasan/common.c:466
__cache_free mm/slab.c:3487 [inline]
kmem_cache_free+0x86/0x260 mm/slab.c:3749
free_task_struct kernel/fork.c:163 [inline]
free_task+0x170/0x1f0 kernel/fork.c:458
__put_task_struct+0x2e0/0x630 kernel/fork.c:731
put_task_struct+0x4b/0x60 include/linux/sched/task.h:98
oom_kill_process.cold+0x93a/0x9d4 mm/oom_kill.c:990
out_of_memory+0x885/0x1420 mm/oom_kill.c:1133
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x160/0x210 mm/memcontrol.c:1393
mem_cgroup_oom mm/memcontrol.c:1721 [inline]
try_charge+0xd44/0x19b0 mm/memcontrol.c:2283
memcg_kmem_charge_memcg+0x7c/0x130 mm/memcontrol.c:2591
memcg_kmem_charge+0x13b/0x340 mm/memcontrol.c:2624
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7b8/0xdc0 mm/page_alloc.c:4559
__alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:473 [inline]
__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:486 [inline]
alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:500 [inline]
alloc_thread_stack_node kernel/fork.c:246 [inline]
dup_task_struct kernel/fork.c:849 [inline]
copy_process+0x847/0x8710 kernel/fork.c:1753
_do_fork+0x1a9/0x1170 kernel/fork.c:2227
__do_sys_clone kernel/fork.c:2334 [inline]
__se_sys_clone kernel/fork.c:2328 [inline]
__x64_sys_clone+0xbf/0x150 kernel/fork.c:2328
do_syscall_64+0x1a3/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880595f6540
which belongs to the cache task_struct(33:syz1) of size 6080
The buggy address is located 1792 bytes inside of
6080-byte region [ffff8880595f6540, ffff8880595f7d00)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea0001657d80 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff888091f65840 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
flags: 0x1fffc0000010200(slab|head)
raw: 01fffc0000010200 ffffea00028b3288 ffffea0002612788 ffff888091f65840
raw: 0000000000000000 ffff8880595f6540 0000000100000001 ffff888057fe2b00
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
page->mem_cgroup:ffff888057fe2b00
--------------------
On looking further it seems like the process selected to be oom-killed
has exited even before reaching read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in
oom_kill_process(). More specifically the tsk->usage is 1 which is due
to get_task_struct() in oom_evaluate_task() and the put_task_struct
within for_each_thread() frees the tsk and for_each_thread() tries to
access the tsk. The easiest fix is to do get/put across the
for_each_thread() on the selected task.
Now the next question is should we continue with the oom-kill as the
previously selected task has exited? However before adding more
complexity and heuristics, let's answer why we even look at the
children of oom-kill selected task? The select_bad_process() has already
selected the worst process in the system/memcg. Due to race, the
selected process might not be the worst at the kill time but does that
matter matter? The userspace can play with oom_score_adj to prefer
children to be killed before the parent. I looked at the history but it
seems like this is there before git history.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 0930b4365be7..1a007dae1e8f 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -981,6 +981,13 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
* still freeing memory.
*/
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * The task 'p' might have already exited before reaching here. The
+ * put_task_struct() will free task_struct 'p' while the loop still try
+ * to access the field of 'p', so, get an extra reference.
+ */
+ get_task_struct(p);
for_each_thread(p, t) {
list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
unsigned int child_points;
@@ -1000,6 +1007,7 @@ static void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, const char *message)
}
}
}
+ put_task_struct(p);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
/*
--
2.20.1.321.g9e740568ce-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists