linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] seccomp test fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <debaac10-04ec-2d59-d2a8-8fce156d5d40@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 20 Jan 2019 12:28:19 -0700
From:   shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Cc:     "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] seccomp test fixes

On 1/19/19 5:43 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 4:12 PM Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here are the fixes I previously mentioned I would send. I previously
>> assumed that the tests were mostly run as root, but it turns out
>> everything else besides the stuff I wrote in the seccomp tests either
>> sets NNP and doesn't require real root, so it all actually works. This
>> set of fixes should make most of the other tests work unprivileged,
>> while XFAIL-ing the one that requires real root.

Tycho, Thanks for a quick response in fixing the problems.
> 
> Awesome. This all looks good to me. :)
> 
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 
> Shuah, can you take this series?
> 


Yes. I will take these in for rc5.

thanks,
-- Shuah