[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121150734.GA30582@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:07:34 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Zhou <David1.Zhou@....com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@....com>,
Michel Daenzer <michel.daenzer@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: disable WC optimization for cache coherent
devices on non-x86
> +#include <linux/dma-noncoherent.h>
This header is not for usage in device drivers, but purely for
dma-mapping implementations!
> +static inline bool drm_device_can_wc_memory(struct drm_device *ddev)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC))
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE);
> + else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS))
> + return !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LOONGSON3);
> + else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86))
> + return true;
> +
> + return !dev_is_dma_coherent(ddev->dev);
And even if something like this was valid to do, it would have to be
a core function with an arch hook, and not hidden in a random driver.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists