linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] PM/runtime:Replace jiffies based accounting with ktime based accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtA_xfTt9KUAR+P=XAhXXyTdQn5ASm8GRcgnYxFFZT5ADg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:17:00 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "Intel graphics driver community testing & development" 
        <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] PM/runtime:Replace jiffies based accounting with
 ktime based accounting

On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 13:08, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 1/18/19 3:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:53 AM Vincent Guittot
> > <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 11:42, Vincent Guittot
> >> <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Guenter,
> >>>
> >>> Le Thursday 17 Jan 2019 à 14:16:28 (-0800), Guenter Roeck a écrit :
> >>>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:33:56AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >>>>> From: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch replaces jiffies based accounting for runtime_active_time
> >>>>> and runtime_suspended_time with ktime base accounting. This makes the
> >>>>> runtime debug counters inline with genpd and other pm subsytems which
> >>>>> uses ktime based accounting.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> timekeeping is initialized before pm_runtime_init() so ktime_get() will
> >>>>> be ready before first call. In fact, timekeeping_init() is called early
> >>>>> in start_kernel() which is way before driver_init() (and that's when
> >>>>> devices can start to be initialized) called from rest_init() via
> >>>>> kernel_init_freeable() and do_basic_setup().
> >>>>>
> >>>> This is not (always) correct. My qemu "collie" boot test fails with this
> >>>> patch applied. Reverting the patch fixes the problem. Bisect log attached.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Can you try the patch below ?
> >>> ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() has the advantage of being init with dummy clock so
> >>> it can be used at early_init.
> >>
> >> Another possibility would be delay the init of the gpiochip
> >
> > Well, right.
> >
> > Initializing devices before timekeeping doesn't feel particularly
> > robust from the design perspective.
> >
> > How exactly does that happen?
> >
>
> With an added 'initialized' flag and backtrace into the timekeeping code,
> with the change suggested earlier applied:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:453 ktime_get_mono_fast_ns+0x114/0x12c
> Timekeeping not initialized
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2-next-20190117-dirty #2
> Hardware name: Sharp-Collie
> Backtrace:
> [<c000dce8>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c000df78>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
>   r7:00000009 r6:00000000 r5:c065ba90 r4:c06d3e54
> [<c000df60>] (show_stack) from [<c0588930>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x28)
> [<c0588910>] (dump_stack) from [<c0018ae8>] (__warn+0xcc/0xf4)
> [<c0018a1c>] (__warn) from [<c0018b5c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x6c)
>   r8:df407b08 r7:00000000 r6:c0c01550 r5:c065bad8 r4:c06dd028
> [<c0018b14>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c0069e2c>] (ktime_get_mono_fast_ns+0x114/0x12c)
>   r3:00000000 r2:c065bad8
>   r5:00000000 r4:df407b08
> [<c0069d18>] (ktime_get_mono_fast_ns) from [<c03c7810>] (pm_runtime_init+0x38/0xb8)
>   r9:c06c9a5c r8:df407b08 r7:00000000 r6:c0c01550 r5:00000000 r4:df407b08
> [<c03c77d8>] (pm_runtime_init) from [<c03b6a34>] (device_initialize+0xb0/0xec)
>   r7:00000000 r6:c0c01550 r5:00000000 r4:df407b08
> [<c03b6984>] (device_initialize) from [<c0366d30>] (gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x9c/0x884)
>   r7:00000000 r6:c06fca34 r5:00000000 r4:00000000
> [<c0366c94>] (gpiochip_add_data_with_key) from [<c06b9708>] (sa1100_init_gpio+0x40/0x98)
>   r10:dfffcd60 r9:c06c9a5c r8:c06dd020 r7:c06dd028 r6:ffffffff r5:00000000
>   r4:c06fca34
> [<c06b96c8>] (sa1100_init_gpio) from [<c06ae58c>] (sa1100_init_irq+0x2c/0x3c)
>   r7:c06dd028 r6:ffffffff r5:c0713300 r4:c06e1070
> [<c06ae560>] (sa1100_init_irq) from [<c06aab1c>] (init_IRQ+0x20/0x28)
>   r5:c0713300 r4:00000000
> [<c06aaafc>] (init_IRQ) from [<c06a7cd0>] (start_kernel+0x254/0x4cc)
> [<c06a7a7c>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] (  (null))
>   r10:0000717f r9:6901b119 r8:c0000100 r7:00000092 r6:0000313d r5:00000053
>   r4:c06a7330
> ---[ end trace 91e1bd00dd7cce32 ]---

Does it means that only the pm_runtime_init is done before
timekeeping_init() but no update_pm_runtime_accounting() ?
In this case, we can keep using ktimeçget in
update_pm_runtime_accounting() and find a solution to deal with
early_call of pm_runtime_init()

Vincent
>
> Guenter